Archives
Work and family policy
Spoilt for choice or spoilt by choice?
Tanya Bretherton
Workplace Research Centre, School of Business, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW
Abstract
Employer perspectives on work–life balance are under-developed and under-represented within the context of public debate on work and family. The current state of policy debate on work and family is grounded in the value of ‘choice’ and implicitly suggests that expanding the range of programs available will inevitably deliver a superior program for employees and employers.
While diversity in program design is obviously an important priority for both parties, the current debate has not substantially increased knowledge or awareness of how best to assess program ‘fit’ nor evaluate program effectiveness for either party.
This paper presents the experience of two organisations which have implemented successful work–life programs by focusing exclusively on workplace and workforce need, rather than policy rhetoric. Comparing the experience of these two organisations demonstrates that the needs of employers may be better served by a shift in the policy debate toward program ‘appropriateness’ and improved program evaluation techniques, and away from ‘choice’.
Government rhetoric on ‘choice’ may actually serve to confuse rather than assist employers in the formation of an integrated and effective organisational wide work and family policy and program.
Keywords
family-friendly, workplace case studies, part-time work, work–life policy, flexibility, working hours.
References
Andrews K (2006) Minister’s report on Work and Family: The Importance of workplace flexibility in promoting balance between work and family, AGPS Canberra.
Appelbaum E, Bailey T, Berg P and Kalleberg A (2001) Shared Work/Valued Care: New norms for organizing market work and unpaid care work, Economic Policy Institute Washington.
Australian Centre for Industrial Relations Research and Training (ACIRRT) (2003) Agreements Database and Monitoring Report, September, University of Sydney.
Australian Human Relations Institute (AHRI) (2007) AHRI Awards for Excellence in Innovation: Applicant Handbook, AHRI Melbourne.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) (2006) Trends in the affordability of child care services 1991-2004. AIHW Bulletin 35, AIHW Canberra.
Barlow K, Junor A and Patterson M (1993) Banking on flexibility. Arena 5: 43-46.
Bittman M and Rice JM (2002) The spectre of overwork: An analysis of trends between 1974 and 1997 using Australian time-use diaries, Labour and Industry 12: 5-25.
Charlesworth S (2005) Striking the Balance or Tipping the Scales? The HREOC women, men, work and family discussion paper, Australian Journal of Labour Law 18: 313-324.
Comans J (1997) Its quality that counts: quality assurance and family day care, Rattler 43: 13–15.
De Ceiri H, Holmes B, Abbott J and Pettit T (2005) Achievements and challenges for work/life balance strategies in Australian organizations, International Journal of Human Resource Management 16: 90-103.
Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (1998) Work and Family State of Play, DEWR Canberra.
Diamond C (2002) Telework: a 'family-friendly' work arrangement, Labour and Industry 13: 39-42.
Hakim C (2003) Competing family models, competing social policies, Family Matters 64: 52-61.
Jaumotte F (2004) Female Labour Force Participation: Past trends and main determinants in OECD countries, OECD Geneva.
Kruesmann M, Hsu E, Vella K and Jones F (2003) 'Balancing parenting and work: understanding women's work orientations and working realities, and pressures of balancing parenting and work', Paper presented at 8th AIFS Conference Steps Forward for Families: Research, Practice and Policy, Melbourne.
Pocock B (2005) Work-life 'balance' in Australia: limited progress, dim prospects, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 43: 198-209.
Pocock B and Masterman Smith H (2004) Workchoices and women, Journal of Australian Political Economy 56: 126-144.
Power K (2005) Parents under pressure, About the House 25: 23-25.
Powlay J (2000) 'Child care affordability', Paper presented to 7th AIFS Conference Family Futures: Issues in Research and Policy, Sydney.
Probert B (2006) 'Would you like choices with that? Women, work and family under Howard', Paper presented to 'New Standards for New Times? The Eight Hour Day and Beyond' 22 June, University of Melbourne.
Reader L (2000) ‘Business versus Bath-Time. The work and family report'. Paper presented at 7th AIFS Conference Family Futures: Issues in Research and Policy Sydney.
Smith M and Ewer P (2005) What about working women? In Sheil C (ed) State of the States, Evatt Foundation Sydney.
Sweeney Research (2004) Mobility and Mistrust, An independent research report commissioned by Toshiba Information Systems Division.
Van Wanrooy B (2005) Adapting to the lifecourse? Evaluating men and women's working-time preferences, Australian Journal of Labour Economics 8: 145-162.
Whitehouse G (2001) Industrial agreements and work/family provisions: trends and prospects under enterprise bargaining, Labour and Industry 12: 109-129.
Whitehouse G and Zetlin D (1999) Family friendly policies: Distribution and implementation in Australian workplaces, Economic and Labour Relations Review 9: 221-239.
Whittard J (2003) Training and career experiences of women part-time workers in a finance sector organisation: persistent remnant of the 'Reserve Army'? Australian Journal of Labour Economics 6: 537-557.
eContent Home
